[Users] conference server

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Jimmy,

from openser interaction, their are equivalent. SEMS uses 
fifo/unix_socket interface, Asterisk uses directly the SIP interface. 
Because of this, from script complexity point of view, I would say SEMS 
is more difficult to integrate than Asterisk. On the other hand Asterisk 
requires specific kernel versions and modules (you may need to 
recompile) for conference support. So......... :)

But you have to choose first based on service requirements, like codecs 
(sems doesn't support non-free codecs), conference scenarios - sems is 
note able to initiate a conference (users may just join), but Asterisk 
can do this.

so, strictly related to openser, I wouldn't say there is a better one - 
you should choose depending of how you want to build the conference service.

regards,
bogdan

jimmy way wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>  I want to use openser to create a conference system.
>It support more than 3 parties conferences. So I need
>an MCU support conference and only transfer the media
>stream(no mixed the voice) for the conference. I know
>that sems and asterisk support conference. Which is
>better for working with openser? How it works?
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>Jimmy
>
>
>		
>____________________________________________________
>Sell on Yahoo! Auctions – no fees. Bid on great items.  
>http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users at openser.org
>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>  
>