[Serusers] Is This Syntax Legal In ser.cfg??

Java Rockx javarockx at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 26 16:24:27 CET 2005


Thanks for the info.

I have one more question.

If "break" always returns true, is there a way to always return false?

Regards,
Paul

--- Marian Dumitru <marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> yes, this syntax is valid. A route() call returns as all the other SER 
> cfg function true or false. The return value of a route is equal to a 
> return value of the last function call from the route.
> NOTE: break returns all the time true :-)
> 
> Best regards,
> Marian
> 
> Java Rockx wrote:
> > Hi All.
> > 
> > Is this allowed in ser.cfg and if so, what causes route(1) to evaluate true or false?
> > 
> > 
> > route {
> > 
> >    if (route(1)) {
> > 
> >      .. do something
> > 
> >    } else {
> > 
> >      .. do something else
> > 
> >    };
> > }
> > 
> > route[1] {
> > 
> >    if (some_condition) {
> > 
> >       setflag(xx);
> > 
> >    } else {
> > 
> >       break;
> > 
> >    };
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 		
> > __________________________________ 
> > Do you Yahoo!? 
> > Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Voice System
> http://www.voice-system.ro
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250




More information about the sr-users mailing list