[Serusers] Grandstream BT100 Shows Caller ID Even With RPIDprivacy=full

[Java Rockx]

Yep. That's right, but I was looking for a way to do _permanent_ caller id blocking so that *67
wasn't required.

Paul


--- Richard <richard at o-matrix.org> wrote:

> *67/68 should be for all following calls. *81/82 are per call. After *67,
> all calls should have anonymous user name if it is supported.
> 
> Richard
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
> > Behalf Of Java Rockx
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:03 PM
> > To: ser users
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Grandstream BT100 Shows Caller ID Even With
> > RPIDprivacy=full
> > 
> > Jiri,
> > 
> > I started down that road of thinking until I realized that having the SIP
> > proxy alter the FROM
> > header was a bad thing.
> > 
> > I wish there were some way, from the ser proxy, to guarantee blocking
> > caller ID for both SIP->PSTN
> > and SIP->SIP calls.
> > 
> > Our situation is that we need to ship IADs/ATAs to customers preconfigured
> > and locked down to keep
> > customers from messing up their settings and to keep them from knowing
> > their SER
> > username/password.  So we can't allow users to permanently enable caller
> > id blocking on their ATA.
> > 
> > I guess *67 is my only choice for now, but this has to be dialed every
> > time a subscriber calls
> > someone :-(
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> > 
> > --- Jiri Kuthan <jiri at iptel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Well, it seems to assume model in which content of caller id is
> > > intended for use by PSTN gateways that see just the caller id
> > > and don't care about content of From then. So all it does is
> > > it enables privacy in the caller id. I think it would make sense
> > > to use "anonymous" From in that case too.
> > >
> > > -jiri
> > >
> > > At 10:49 PM 1/24/2005, Java Rockx wrote:
> > > >Hi All.
> > > >
> > > >Does anyone know why my grandstream BT100 firmware 1.0.5.16 shows the
> > caller ID rather than
> > > >"anonymous" even though I have Remote-Part-ID enabled with
> privacy=full?
> > > >
> > > >Below is the INVITE message sent to the BT100 from a UTstarcom ATA.
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Paul
> > > >
> > > >U 2005/01/24 16:43:55.073424 68.84.xxx.xxx:5060 -> 68.84.xxx.xxx:13721
> > > >INVITE sip:3215551212 at 68.84.xxx.xxx:13721;user=phone SIP/2.0.
> > > >Record-Route: <sip:68.84.xxx.xxx;ftag=2590080990;lr=on>.
> > > >Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK5082.72060543.0.
> > > >Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> > 192.168.0.86:5060;rport=1041;received=68.84.xxx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK14034648
> > 25.
> > > >From: UTStarcom <sip:4075551212 at mycompany.com>;tag=2590080990.
> > > >To: <sip:3215551212 at mycompany.com>.
> > > >Call-ID: 1980470039 at 192.168.0.86.
> > > >CSeq: 1301 INVITE.
> > > >Contact: <sip:4075551212 at 68.84.xxx.xxx:1041>.
> > > >max-forwards: 16.
> > > >subject: sipcall.
> > > >Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY.
> > > >Content-Type: application/sdp.
> > > >Content-Length: 178.
> > > >Remote-Party-ID: "Anonymous"
> > >
> > ><sip:unknown at 68.84.xxx.xxx;user=phone>;party=calling;screen=yes;id-
> > type=subscriber;privacy=full.
> > > >.
> > > >v=0.
> > > >o=- 1363 3077 IN IP4 192.168.0.86.
> > > >s=-.
> > > >c=IN IP4 68.84.xxx.xxx.
> > > >t=0 0.
> > > >m=audio 36526 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 2 4 101.
> > > >a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.
> > > >a=fmtp:101 0-15.
> > > >a=ptime:20.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >__________________________________
> > > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > > >Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> > > >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Serusers mailing list
> > > >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
> > http://my.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250