[Serusers] Carrier-grade framework for SER

[Greger V. Teigre]

Juha,
Yes, I completely agree with you. However, I don't need to read the spec and 
far from understand it before I use it... ;-)  So I did start to look at 
SOAP and have very good experiences, both in terms of usability and 
scalability.
    But, I don't have strong opinions, if the people who are going to use 
the interface are all against SOAP, XMLRPC is the right choice.

The xmlrpc-provisioning work you have done, can it be coordinated with 
Andreas' effort?
g-)

Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Greger V. Teigre writes:
>
>> As I indicated in an earlier email, I would be interested in taking
>> part in a joint effort to further develop ser's high-availability
>> and scalability (HAS).  I would probably have to do some development
>> anyway, and I would prefer to see such support in the public domain.
>> In Nov/Dec I called for responses on a SOAP-based provisioning
>> interface, but heard nothing,
>> so here is an overlap of interests.
>
> greger,
>
> we have done some work on xmlprc based provisioning and it looks
> promising.  xmlrpc spec is three pages long and even i can understand
> it.  soap spec, on the other hand, is far too thick and goes way above
> my head.
>
> -- juha