[Serusers] ;lr=on> versus ;lr> -- which is RFC3261 compliant?

[Java Rockx]

I suppose then that Asterisk just isn't RFC3261 compliant -- which
doesn't surprise me.

Thanks for pointing me to section 25.1

Regards,
Paul


On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:39:49 +1100, Zeus Ng <zeus.ng at isquare.com.au> wrote:
> Not entirely true!
> 
> Although RFC3261 section 19.1.1 did `indicate' ";lr=on", section 25.1 have
> the following BNF notation.
> 
> uri-parameters    =  *( ";" uri-parameter)
> uri-parameter     =  transport-param / user-param / method-param
>                      / ttl-param / maddr-param / lr-param / other-param
> lr-param          = "lr"
> other-param       = pname [ "=" pvalue ]
> 
> So ";lr" is the correct BNF. However, I would agree that ";lr=on" is a more
> elegant approach.
> 
> BTW, SER accept both, and generate ";lr" by default. To get SER generate
> ";lr=on", check the enable_full_lr parameter in rr module.
> 
> Zeus
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org
> > [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Java Rockx
> > Sent: Friday, 25 February 2005 4:06 PM
> > To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: [Serusers] ;lr=on> versus ;lr> -- which is RFC3261 compliant?
> >
> >
> > Hi all.
> >
> > We have a partner with a Sonus box that we use for PSTN termination.
> >
> > Their Sonus box produces suspect Record-Route headers. Can
> > anyone tell me if it is compliant with RFC3261?
> >
> > A sample header that I receive looks like this:
> >
> > Record-Route: <sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060;lr>
> >
> > And I discovered that Asterisk-1.0.2 seems to not properly
> > handle these messages so it does strict routing rather than
> > loose routing.
> >
> > Greg greger at teigre.com was kind enough to point me to RFC3261
> > Section 19.1.1 which seems to indicate that ;lr> should be
> > ;lr=on> for complance.
> >
> > Is this correct?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> 
>