[Serusers] Turn 3xx into new Invite
Paul Belanger
paul.belanger at pronexus.com
Tue Feb 22 19:56:20 CET 2005
Just got a reply from a fellow SER user to add append_branch() fuction, but I still cannot see the INVITE from my SER.
onreply_route[1] {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "Reply status %rs: Reason %rr\n");
if (t_check_status("302")) {
xlog("L_NOTICE", "We got a 302!!!!!\n");
## Used to send INVITE message? ##
append_branch();
};
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Koenig [mailto:martin.koenig at toplink-plannet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:33 AM
To: Paul Belanger
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Turn 3xx into new Invite
Hello,
see: http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-December/014107.html
looks like Juha Heinänen has a patch for this available somewhere, maybe
he would like to share this?
Regards,
Martin
Paul Belanger schrieb:
>Ya, I have looked at that one, but I can see how it sends out the
>INVITE.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Koenig [mailto:martin.koenig at toplink-plannet.de]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:09 AM
>To: Paul Belanger
>Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Turn 3xx into new Invite
>
>
>Hello,
>
>there is this one so far:
>
>http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-August/010977.html
>
>Didn't really help...
>
>Regards,
>Martin
>
>Paul Belanger schrieb:
>
>
>
>>Rumor has it yes, but I have not been successful. I posted a question
>>last week, and was told to search the archives. I did, but not much
>>came up!
>>
>>http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=302+site%3Amail.iptel.org&btnG=Goo
>>g
>>le+Search&meta=
>>
>>I think I'm on the right track, but don't have time today to play with
>>it. Here is what I got so far:
>>
>>#
>># $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.4.1 2003/11/10 15:35:15 andrei Exp $
>>#
>># simple quick-start config script
>>#
>>
>># ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
>>
>>#debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
>>#fork=yes
>>#log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
>>
>>debug=3
>>fork=no
>>log_stderror=yes
>>
>>check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
>>dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
>>rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
>>#port=5060
>>#children=4
>>fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
>>
>># ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
>>
>># Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
>>#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
>>
>>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
>>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
>>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
>>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
>>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
>>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
>>loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/xlog.so"
>>
>># Uncomment this if you want digest authentication
>># mysql.so must be loaded !
>>#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
>>#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
>>
>># ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
>>
>># -- usrloc params --
>>
>>modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
>>
>># Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
>># for persistent storage and comment the previous line
>>#modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
>>
>># -- auth params --
>># Uncomment if you are using auth module
>>#
>>#modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
>>#
>># If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this
>>config), # uncomment also the following parameter) #
>>#modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
>>
>># -- rr params --
>># add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr",
>>"enable_full_lr", 1)
>>
>>modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 15 )
>>modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 10 )
>>
>># ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
>>
>># main routing logic
>>
>>route{
>>
>> # initial sanity checks -- messages with
>> # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
>> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
>> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
>> break;
>> };
>> if ( msg:len > max_len ) {
>> sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
>> break;
>> };
>>
>> # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
>> # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
>> # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
>> # use different transport protocol
>> record_route();
>> # loose-route processing
>> if (loose_route()) {
>> t_relay();
>> break;
>> };
>>
>> # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc
>> # (in case, it does not work, use the following command
>> # with proper names and addresses in it)
>> if (uri==myself) {
>>
>> if (method=="REGISTER") {
>> save("location");
>> break;
>> };
>> };
>>
>>
>> if (method=="INVITE") {
>> rewritehostport("216.143.130.70:5060");
>> t_on_reply("1");
>> t_on_failure("1");
>> t_relay();
>> break;
>> }
>>
>>}
>>
>>onreply_route[1] {
>> xlog("L_NOTICE", "Reply status %rs: Reason %rr\n");
>> if (t_check_status("302")) {
>> xlog("L_NOTICE", "We got a 302!!!!!\n");
>> ## ADD CODE TO SEND OUT INVITE!! ###
>> };
>>}
>>
>>failure_route[1] {
>> xlog("L_NOTICE", "Failure status %rs: Reason %rr\n"); }
>>
>>Let me know if you find any information.
>>
>>Paul
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org]
>>On
>>Behalf Of Martin Koenig
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:00 AM
>>To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>Subject: [Serusers] Turn 3xx into new Invite
>>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>is it possible to take 3xx-responses in a reply_route and turn them
>>into
>>a new INVITE on Ser using append_branch or simliar?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Martin
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list