[Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..

[Jan Janak]

Not yet, but we are close to stable status. So far no major flaws have
been discovered.

  Jan.

On 16-02 09:07, Steve Blair wrote:
> 
> Jamey:
> 
>  Has 0.9.0 moved to current stable status? I thought it was still
> in that transition state.
> 
> Thanks,Steve
> 
> Matt Schulte wrote:
> 
> >Ah k, I checked out the cvsroot of ser and everything is dated months
> >ago. Is there something I'm missing? :-).. Also ser "stable" is still at
> >0.9.0 right?
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jamey Hicks [mailto:jamey.hicks at hp.com] 
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 7:47 AM
> >To: Matt Schulte
> >Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >Subject: Re: [Serusers] Ok, I gotta ask..
> >
> >
> >Matt Schulte wrote:
> >
> > 
> >
> >>Is ser being actively developed anymore? Everywhere I go on iptel's 
> >>website, everything is horridly outdated. Is there an alternative to 
> >>ser? We like ser a lot but don't want to continue inhouse devel on a 
> >>"dead" program. Asterisk doesn't even come close to the processing 
> >>power of ser, that can't be it... ??
> >>
> >>	
> >>
> >>   
> >>
> >Ser is still being actively developed.  If you're doing in-house 
> >development on ser, I suggest you join the serdev mailing list so that 
> >you can keep up on what's going on with other ser developments.
> >
> >Jamey
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > 
> >
> 
> -- 
>  
> ISC Network Engineering
> The University of Pennsylvania
> 3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
> Philadelphia, PA 19104  
> 
> 
> voice: 215-573-8396 
> 
>       215-746-8001
> 
> fax: 215-898-9348    
> 
> sip:blairs at upenn.edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers