[Serusers] Changing Sip Port

[Voipers Portugal]

There are 2 port setting that you can change. Either you change the
signalling port to contact SER:

when specifying the SIP Server just do: sip_server:port

In this case, if you change the port, make sure that your SER Server is
listening on that port as well.

Or you can change the listen port of your Softphone. In this case, you don't
need to alter anything else. Not sure about what you wanted. Can you provide
the SIP messages log?

Jose Simoes


On 12/13/05, Juan <juan at uwtcallback.com> wrote:
>
>
>  Hi Jose.
> I tried your way but I did not get it registred. I used many ports but
> couldn't get it registred.
> I am not using any authentication and when using port 5060 the softphone
> registres OK.
> My SER and my softphone (X- lite) are on the same network.
> Any ideas?
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Juan Ferrari
> United World Telecom
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Voipers Portugal
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 10, 2005 8:48 AM
> *Cc:* serusers at lists.iptel.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] Changing Sip Port
>
>
>  Most softphones allow that. When you are specifying a SIP server, for
> default (normally) it uses 5060. If you want to alter this port just do the
> following:
>
> ser_IP_address:port_number
>
> 127.0.0.1:5090
>
> Jose Simoes
>
> p.s. this works with X-Lite
>
> On 12/5/05, Andrey Kouprianov <andrey.kouprianov at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I guess it depends on your softphone... if it chooses to communicate
> > from port 5060, there's nothing you can do about it, unless you can
> > change it in the phone's settings...
> > Some softphones, for instance, get a random port...
> >
> > On 12/5/05, sagar <vids_cs at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >  Hi All,
> > >
> > >  I am using ser 0.8.14 +asterisk B2bua.
> > >
> > >  Currently  softphone is registering on standard sip port 5060  .
> > >  Is it possibe to use any other port  like 5090 or 8069
> > >
> > >
> > >  I tried to do so by changing the listining port to 5090 in ser.cfgbut in
> > > case the softphone is not getting register.
> > >
> > >
> > >  Here is the ser log
> > >
> > >
> > >  0(11348) SIP Request:
> > >   0(11348)  method:  <REGISTER>
> > >   0(11348)  uri:     <sip: 192.168.1.100>
> > >   0(11348)  version: <SIP/2.0>
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=1
> > >   0(11348) end of header reached, state=5
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: Via found, flags=1
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: this is the first via
> > >   0(11348) After parse_msg...
> > >   0(11348) preparing to run routing scripts...
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG : is_maxfwd_present: searchi ng for max_forwards
> > header
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=128
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=8
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: add_param:
> > > tag=fa37b062306344d68023aed26289e820
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: add_param: epid=f657995ecc
> > >   0(11348) end of header reached, state=29
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=256
> > >   0(11348) end of header reached, state=9
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [37];
> > > uri=[sip:2851816416 at 192.168.1.100:5090]
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: to body [<sip:2851816416 at 192.168.1.100:5090>
> > >  ]
> > >   0(11348) get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <1> <REGISTER>
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
> > >   0(11348) found end of header
> > >   0(11348) find_first_route(): No Route headers found
> > >   0(11348) loose_route(): There is no Route HF
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=64
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=33554432
> > >   0(11348) check_self - checking if host==us: 13==13 &&  [
> > 192.168.1.100] ==
> > > [192.168.1.100 ]
> > >   0(11348) check_self - checking if port 5090 matches port 5060
> > >   0(11348) check_self: host != me
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: t_addifnew: msg id=1 , global msg id=0 , T on
> > > entrance=0xffffffff
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=-1
> > >   0(11348) parse_headers: flags=60
> > >   0(11348) t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=58712, isACK=0
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: proceeding to pre-RFC3261 transaction matching
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
> > >   0(11348) check_via_address(192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.2, 0)
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[4]: 0xb6165fe8
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG: add_to_tail_of_timer[0]: 0xb6165ffc
> > >   0(11348) SER: new transacti on fwd'ed
> > >   0(11348) DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroing list (nil)
> > >   0(11348) receive_msg: cleaning up
> > >
> > >  Please advise.
> > >
> > >  Thanks In Advance.
> > >
> > >
> > >  ________________________________
> > >  Yahoo! Personals
> > >  Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
> > >  Lots of someones, actually. Yahoo! Personals
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20051213/ee4351ed/attachment.htm>