[Serusers] (open)SER and ICE

[Teemu Harju]

Couterpath (www.counterpath.com) (formerly known as Xten) has this Xtunnel (
www.xtunnels.org) which sort of solves the NAT traversal problem. I haven't
used it but I think it does. Correct me if I'm wrong. Btw... does anyone
have experience using Xtunnel in their system?

Of course only clients supporting this are their own.. x-lite & eyebeam, but
they aren't the worst clients around. Eyebeam has even sort of "ICE
support". Meaning no TURN protocol, but STUN and Xtunnel.

- Teemu

2005/12/1, Cesc <cesc.santa at gmail.com>:
>
> On 11/30/05, Nils Ohlmeier <lists at ohlmeier.org> wrote:
> > What you are probably thinking of is, that an UA with ICE support could
> also
> > advertise its IP address and port of the RTP proxy, but this is then
> called
> > TURN. And I think that is even more far away from becoming a standard,
> > besides that their are AFAIK no UA's or TURN servers available yet.
> >
> > Hope this helps
> >  Nils
> >
> I think that the MiniSIP project is developing one client and
> server... www.minisip.org, in the "branches" of the SVN repository. No
> idea how far is it from being usable at all.
>
> Cesc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>



--
Teemu Harju
http://www.teemuharju.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20051201/0a9b1b71/attachment.htm>