[Users] More Routing....

[Douglas Garstang]

Ok, I'm very confused about this. Bogdan mentioned that the RURI is consumed? When is it consumed?

-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:31 AM
To: Douglas Garstang
Cc: users at openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing....


append_branch will add a new branch. But the t_relay in failure route 
only uses the new branch, as the previous branch is alreaddy terminated.

klaus

Douglas Garstang wrote:
> Klaus,
> 
> But, doesn't append_branch cause parallel forking? I don't want parallel forking. If I do parallel forking, the same registration may get delivered to the same Asterisk box twice, and that's not what I want.
> 
> Doug.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:01 AM
> To: Douglas Garstang
> Cc: users at openser.org
> Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing....
> 
> 
> Where's the problem? in route[1] or in the failure route?
> 
> You need append branch in failure route
> 
> klaus
> 
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
> 
>>Can someone please tell me why the following extremely simple example doesn't first attempt to relay to 192.168.10.7, and then if that fails, try 192.168.10.8? What am I missing here? The documentation says that t_relay() simple sends statefully to the current URI.... seems to be what I am doing. What am I missing? Please help!
>>
>>route(1);
>>
>>route[1] {
>>	rewritehostport("192.168.10.7:5060");
>>	t_on_failure("2");
>>	t_relay();
>>}
>>
>>failure_route[2] {
>>	rewritehostport('192.168.10.8:5060");
>>	t_relay();
>>}
>>
>>Doug.
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at openser.org
>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
> 
> 
>