[Users] More Routing....

[Douglas Garstang]

Klaus,

But, doesn't append_branch cause parallel forking? I don't want parallel forking. If I do parallel forking, the same registration may get delivered to the same Asterisk box twice, and that's not what I want.

Doug.

-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:01 AM
To: Douglas Garstang
Cc: users at openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing....


Where's the problem? in route[1] or in the failure route?

You need append branch in failure route

klaus

Douglas Garstang wrote:
> Can someone please tell me why the following extremely simple example doesn't first attempt to relay to 192.168.10.7, and then if that fails, try 192.168.10.8? What am I missing here? The documentation says that t_relay() simple sends statefully to the current URI.... seems to be what I am doing. What am I missing? Please help!
> 
> route(1);
> 
> route[1] {
> 	rewritehostport("192.168.10.7:5060");
> 	t_on_failure("2");
> 	t_relay();
> }
> 
> failure_route[2] {
> 	rewritehostport('192.168.10.8:5060");
> 	t_relay();
> }
> 
> Doug.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
>