[Serusers] Hairpin solutions?
giannici at neomedia.it
Fri Aug 26 16:16:15 CEST 2005
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> beg my pardon, but I don't really think that one needs a session border control, particularly
> becasue of the reasons related to bad scalability, bandwidth waste and latency. Sinle point
> of failure is another concern.
Yes, I wasn't looking for "far end" (in the service provider) solutions,
but the "near end" seems appropriate...
Anyway, I was looking for a smaller solution, something for small
offices, from 2 to 10-20 phones.
Now I was asking myself if an Asterisk solution could work.
Can Asterisk work as a SIP proxy behind a NAT?
Does it have a STUN client?
> At 02:20 PM 8/26/2005, Carlo wrote:
>>What you need is a session border control.
>>Try this link from Jasomi : http://www.jasomi.com/ppfes.html
>>or this from Kagoor ( now Juniper ) http://www.juniper.net/customers/support/products/vf1000.jsp
>>Federico Giannici ha scritto:
>>>Considering that we DON'T want to use an RTP Proxy (bad scalability, waste of bandwidth and longer delays), is there any solution to the "hairpin" problems?
>>>Are there any "boxes" that look at the SIP messages and short-circuit calls from and to the local network?
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
|- giannici at neomedia.it
|ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it
More information about the sr-users