[Serusers] Timeout

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Mon Aug 22 17:33:09 CEST 2005


AVPOPS should work - that's probably the most used use-case for AVPOPS.

klaus

Sebastian Kühner wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Thanks for your answer.
> 
> What would help me is if I would be able to give some "variable" to the
> failure_route.
> 
> Something like that:
> 
> if (method == "CANCEL") {
>     "setvariable"(test);
> };
> 
> setflag and avpops doesn't work. The flags/variables are deleted befor
> reaching my failure route.
> 
> Any idea?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Andreas Granig" <andreas.granig at inode.info>
> To: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner at veraza.com>; "Jan Janak" <jan at iptel.org>
> Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 11:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Timeout
> 
> 
> 
>>Sebastian Kühner wrote:
>>
>>>U 2005/08/19 09:45:46.997466 xxx.xxx.xxx.234:5060 ->
> 
> xxx.xxx.xxx.181:1024
> 
>>>SIP/2.0 200 ok -- no more pending branches.
>>
>>Hm... this one is generated in e2e_cancel(...) in modules/tm/t_fwd.c:363
>>but I can't see anything there which stops fr_timer for the branch (but
>>I'm not familiar with the tm-code). cancel_bm seems to be zero, so not
>>very much is done there...
>>Maybe someone of the core developers should have a look?
>>
>>Andy
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list