[Serusers] Timeout
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Mon Aug 22 17:33:09 CEST 2005
AVPOPS should work - that's probably the most used use-case for AVPOPS.
klaus
Sebastian Kühner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> What would help me is if I would be able to give some "variable" to the
> failure_route.
>
> Something like that:
>
> if (method == "CANCEL") {
> "setvariable"(test);
> };
>
> setflag and avpops doesn't work. The flags/variables are deleted befor
> reaching my failure route.
>
> Any idea?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andreas Granig" <andreas.granig at inode.info>
> To: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner at veraza.com>; "Jan Janak" <jan at iptel.org>
> Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 11:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Timeout
>
>
>
>>Sebastian Kühner wrote:
>>
>>>U 2005/08/19 09:45:46.997466 xxx.xxx.xxx.234:5060 ->
>
> xxx.xxx.xxx.181:1024
>
>>>SIP/2.0 200 ok -- no more pending branches.
>>
>>Hm... this one is generated in e2e_cancel(...) in modules/tm/t_fwd.c:363
>>but I can't see anything there which stops fr_timer for the branch (but
>>I'm not familiar with the tm-code). cancel_bm seems to be zero, so not
>>very much is done there...
>>Maybe someone of the core developers should have a look?
>>
>>Andy
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list