skuehner at veraza.com
Fri Aug 19 20:25:14 CEST 2005
OK, many thanks!
The only question that I have now is why my ser doesn't make that...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Iqbal" <iqbal at gigo.co.uk>
To: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner at veraza.com>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] cancal
> I stand corrected, I just checked you should get a 487
> Sebastian Kühner wrote:
> >If the response of CANCEL is OK, why does the request 487 Request
> >exist then?
> >Well, I think one more day on this and I will rewrite ser to save time...
> >The main problem is that ser goes into the failover route (on timeout),
> >although I've canceled the call...
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
More information about the sr-users