[Serusers] cancal

[Sebastian Kühner]

OK, many thanks!

The only question that I have now is why my ser doesn't make that...


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Iqbal" <iqbal at gigo.co.uk>
To: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner at veraza.com>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] cancal


> I stand corrected, I just checked you should get a 487
>
> Iqbal
>
> Sebastian Kühner wrote:
>
> >If the response of CANCEL is OK, why does the request 487 Request
Terminated
> >exist then?
> >
> >Well, I think one more day on this and I will rewrite ser to save time...
> >
> >The main problem is that ser goes into the failover route (on timeout),
> >although I've canceled the call...
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >
>
>