[Serusers] cancal

[Sebastian Kühner]

Hello,

I made a ngrep and I noticed that NO "487 Request Cancelled" is reaching my
ser on CANCEL. That could be the problem.

I also tried to use the avpops module:

if (method == "CANCEL") {
    setflag(1);
    avp_write("cancel", "s:failover");
    log(1, "-CANCEL PSTN-\n");
};

...and then with avp_check in the failover route. Without result. Could it
be that the variables in the avp don't reach another route?

Thanks for your help

Sebastian



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bayan William Towfiq" <william at telepacket.com>
To: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner at veraza.com>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] cancal


> Hi Sebastian,
> Sorry about that, I misread the code. I will test your code and dig up
> an example of how I do it in my failure routes to show you.
>
> William
>
> Sebastian Kühner wrote:
>
> >Hi William,
> >
> >Thanks for your help.
> >
> >In my failover route I have the following code:
> >
> >failure_route[2] {
> >    if (t_check_status("408|500|503"))
> >    {
> >        log (1, "next gateway...\n");
> >        if (!next_gw())
> >        {
> >            t_reply("503", "Service not available, no more gateways");
> >            break;
> >        }
> >        log (1, "gateway changed...\n");
> >        t_on_failure("2");
> >        t_relay();
> >    }
> >}
> >
> >So the status is already filtered. I tried your code but without
result...
> >
> >Does anybody know how I can stop the failover timer?
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: "Bayan William Towfiq" <william at telepacket.com>
> >To: "Sebastian Kühner" <skuehner at veraza.com>
> >Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> >Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 1:28 AM
> >Subject: Re: [Serusers] cancal
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hi Sebastian,
> >>If the message is a cancel you it will have status 487
> >>
> >>so you can just add
> >>
> >>        if (t_check_status("487")) {
> >>                break;
> >>        };
> >>
> >>before the rest of the code in the failure route. You can mail me
> >>privately if you have any more questions about this issue.
> >>
> >>William
> >>
> >>Sebastian Kühner wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>I'm using ser to forward to PSTN Gatways.
> >>>
> >>>Before the t_relay I put the command:
> >>>
> >>>t_on_failure("2");
> >>>
> >>>So, after a timeout ser goes to:
> >>>
> >>>failure_route[2] {
> >>>   log (1, "next gateway...\n");
> >>>   if (t_check_status("408|500|503"))
> >>>   {
> >>>       if (!next_gw())
> >>>       {
> >>>           t_reply("503", "Service not available, no more gateways");
> >>>           break;
> >>>       }
> >>>   log (1, "gateway changed...\n");
> >>>   }
> >>>   t_on_failure("2");
> >>>   t_relay();
> >>>}
> >>>
> >>>This is working very good... if the user doesn't make a hangup.
> >>>
> >>>If caller hangs up, the CANCEL hits SER and the call is cleanly
> >>>
> >>>
> >terminated.
> >
> >
> >>>SER however continues to failure_route after timeout of the initial
> >>>INVITE... ser sends out a new INVITE message to another PSTN-Server...
> >>>
> >>>
> >and
> >
> >
> >>>the phone rings (with nobody in the line)
> >>>
> >>>Many thanks for your help!
> >>>
> >>>Sebastian
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Serusers mailing list
> >>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>