[Serusers] Mediaproxy, fix_contact, and ip:port checks

[Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya]

yup.
that pretty much did the trick.

ta much mates....

Greger V. Teigre wrote:

> Yes, and nat_uac_test("16") for testing the ports.
> g-)
>
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Just out of curiosity - do you know how fix_nated_contact from
>> nathelper module behaves in this scenario? If it works right, you can
>> use the nathelper module for fixing the contact.
>>
>> regards,
>> klaus
>>
>> Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya wrote:
>>
>>> Currently, fix_contact immediately returns if src_ip == contact_ip
>>>
>>> However, there are a bunch-a situations where src_ip==contact_ip, but
>>> src_port != contact_port
>>> (Dont even ask.  Just blame the *really* bizarre cable routers that
>>> Comcast deploys every now and then)
>>>
>>> I *could* go about modifying  FixContact in functions.c to check both
>>> the ip and port.
>>>
>>> Question is, should I?  Is there something I am missing as to why we
>>> check only the IP?  Should I be explicitly *not* checking the port?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mahesh.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 332 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050803/0fe630c2/attachment-0001.vcf>