[Users] #DEFINE equivalent?
Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya
mahesh at aptela.com
Tue Aug 30 19:09:54 CEST 2005
because i didn't think of it?
cheers, and thanx
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya wrote:
>> I totally agree.
>> Personally, I've been ripping out large chunks of my config file, and
>> replacing it with varioud avpops based stuff - it may be *slightly*
>> more convoluted, but it is completely database configurable, and
>> hence easier to maintain
>> re: rr, its actually neither. Its a static, which i'm using to
>> identify NAT'ed clients to account for re-INVITEs
> why don't you use the append_rr_param() function to added the NAT
> identifier to the RR hdr? do a normal record_route() and if nat is
> detected, add the param
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>> Hi Kanakatti,
>>> I'm for m4'ing (for the moment) for two reasons:
>>> 1) since we can do it with m4, I prefer to use the cycles for
>>> something still missing;
>>> 2) using dynamic parameters (like via AVPs) reduce the
>>> performance - time to look for the AVP and most critical the
>>> impossibility of calling fixup functions at startup (which will
>>> force to fix params at runtime, for each processing).
>>> regarding the record_route_preset() - do you use dynamic parameters
>>> or dynamic rr URI?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 332 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the sr-users