[Serusers] Question regarding *98, *67 etc.

[Dave]

Elena,
But from what I can see, 4xx, 5xx and 6xx refer to
"errors" as per the RFC. It would be nice if there was
another sequence (such as 9xx) for informational
purposes only. 
Thanks
--- Elena Ramona Modroiu <ramona at voice-system.ro>
wrote:
> You could you a new reply code from classes 4xx or
> 5xx (these two look 
> more appropriate, although you can use a 6xx reply
> too -- see chapter 21 
> in RFC3261 about reply codes) with a special reason
> phrase (Call 
> forwarding enabled). Many phones display the reason
> phrase and that 
> should help the caller to understand what happened.
> 
> A nicer way, imo, is to redirect the call to an
> announcement server that 
> plays a confirmation message.
> 
> Ramona
> 
> Dave wrote:
> 
> >I am using avpops to allow services such as
> >call-forwarding, dnd, etc. I want to allow the
> users
> >to be able to enter sequences such as *982223333,
> >implying that he wants call forwarding enabled and
> the
> >number to forward to is 2223333. 
> >
> >Question: Once SER gets the INVITE and stores the
> >number to forward in an AVP, what response should
> SER
> >send back to the UA? It cannot be 200 OK. I would
> like
> >to send a response that basically displays "Call
> >forwarding enabled" and ends the transaction.
> >
> >Thanks in advance
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> >http://mail.yahoo.com 
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >  
> >
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com