[Serusers] failure_route vs. onreply
Jiri Kuthan
jiri at iptel.org
Wed Apr 20 19:07:08 CEST 2005
At 02:31 PM 4/20/2005, Matt Schulte wrote:
>Ok, are these the same thing?
no
failure_route reprocesses requests which failed. onreply processes
replies coming back.
-jiri
>I remember reading that onreply was
>renamed to failure due to confusion? Now I'm confused again ;-)
>
> Matt
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
More information about the sr-users
mailing list