[Serusers] (no subject)

[Java Rockx]

ljzhang,

Also, one post is usually sufficient to get a response from this mailing 
list.

Regards,
Paul

On 4/12/05, ljzhang <xueyou38 at 163.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is my confusion about SER supporting NAT transversal.
> 
> 1. With only RTPProxy, what kinds of types of NAT can SER with nathelper 
> transverse?
> 2. What's the difference between MediaProxy and RTPProxy?
> 3. If UA supports STUN, do SER need to configure nathelper to support NAT 
> transversal? Just because I knew STUN protocol only process a few kinds of 
> types of NAT, I want to know what advantage it will add if I configure SER 
> with nathelper.
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> 
> ljzhang
> xueyou38 at 163.com
> 2005-04-12
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050419/ebbfbe01/attachment.htm>