[Serusers] Bug # 2925

[Jiri Kuthan]

The bug report is invalid, ignore it. branch=0 in ACK to a 200
is perfectly valid according to RFC3261. Your termination provider
must be using a buggy devices.

-jiri

At 07:04 PM 4/19/2005, Darryl H. Thomas wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>I was wondering whether anyone knew what was going on with the following
>bug:
>http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=2925&group_id=480
>
>For those not wanting to follow the links, this is a bug submitted by
>someone back in December wherein ser puts 'branch=0' in the Via header it
>creates for an ACK to a 200 OK Invite response.
>
>I haven't seen any activity related to this, and it's affecting
>interoperability with one of our termination providers.
>
>0.9.0 users, have you seen the same problem??
>
>Cheers,
>Darryl
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/