[Serusers] tsend_dgram in tsend.c problems while RTP transffering in SER-0.9.0

Parvel parvel.gu at gmail.com
Fri Apr 15 03:15:54 CEST 2005


Hi,

I've tried to trace the process with GDB. It seems a cooperation problem
between SEMS and SER. While SER sending some response to SEMS (the buffer
content is a 200 OK), the reply_addr passed to tsend_dgram() remained to all
zeros.
Is it the fault of SEMS or SER? Maybe we need more trace.

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro] 
发送时间: 2005年4月14日 22:32
收件人: Parvel
抄送: serusers at lists.iptel.org
主题: Re: [Serusers] tsend_dgram in tsend.c problems while RTP transffering
in SER-0.9.0

the script chunk seams ok. But judging after the text error, the problem 
is not when passing the requests to SEMS (when tsend_dgram_ev() function 
is used), but when the SER unix server receives a command from SEMS and 
tries to send back a reply (via tsend_dgram() function).
Increase the debug level to get more info about the error context.

bogdan

Parvel wrote:

>I used a soft phone to connect with the server. The SIP messages seems OK,
>the INVITE, 100, 200, ACK messages are exchanged, connection established,
>G711u codec is used to transfer. But the RTP stage seems wrong. In the
>sniffer only the soft phone's RTP packets are sent, but none of the
server's
>response received. In the debug mode it seems the SEMS sent the response to
>socket, but the SER throw some error messages.
>
># ser -d -E
>              127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
> 0(1926) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 10.167.16.32
>              10.167.16.32 [10.167.16.32]:5060
>              127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
> 0(1926) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 10.167.16.32
>              10.167.16.32 [10.167.16.32]:5060
>Listening on 
>             udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
>             udp: 10.167.16.32 [10.167.16.32]:5060
>             tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
>             tcp: 10.167.16.32 [10.167.16.32]:5060
>Aliases: 
>             tcp: localhost:5060
>             tcp: localhost.localdomain:5060
>             tcp: VM-Redhat:5060
>             udp: localhost:5060
>             udp: localhost.localdomain:5060
>             udp: VM-Redhat:5060
>
>stateless - initializing
>[root at VM-Redhat root]#  0(0) Maxfwd module- initializing
> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535
> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070
> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535
> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070
> 1(1929) 
>to: 
> 1(1929) ERROR: tsend_dgram: failed to send: (107) Transport endpoint is
not
>connected
>16(1944) ERROR: tsend_dgram: failed to send: (22) Invalid argument
>
>While sending the RTP packet, the terminate also sent some RTCP packets,
but
>a ICMP port unreachable response received.
>
>By the way, when the BYE request is sent, a first 404 response received,
>then the 200 OK. Maybe the conf files are not correct?
>  
>




More information about the sr-users mailing list