[Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of RAM resources.

[Java Rockx]

Perhaps the new mediaproxy-1.3 will fix this. I'm just graping for straws 
here.

Regards,
Paul

On Apr 11, 2005 4:55 PM, Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote:
> 
> Hello list.
> Regarding to this issue. These are the results for my "production"
> machine after upgrade the Python from 2.3 to 2.4.1.
> 
> Since Friday the %MEM is 0.5, as the output of the "top" command indicate 
> :
> 
> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
> 6131 root 15 0 5460 5460 2492 S 9.9 0.5 119:04 0
> mediaproxy.py
> 
> So, it works!. For the record i'm using :
> 
> OS : Red Hat 9.0
> Python : 2.4.1
> SER: 0.8.14
> mediaproxy : 1.2.1
> 
> Regards,
> Ricardo Martinez.-
> 
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:rmartinez at redvoiss.net]
> > Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Abril de 2005 18:18
> > Para: 'Lucas Aimaretto'; serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of
> > RAM resources.
> >
> >
> > Regarding to this issue
> > Well, thanks to Lucas, just to test i changed the
> > pyhton version in
> > my "lab" server from python2.3 to pyhton2.4.1. I made the
> > same test with
> > the rtpgenerator and "voila".
> >
> > Check it out :
> >
> > Before 80 simultaneus calls :
> >
> > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> > 13915 root 15 0 4628 4628 2068 S 1.0 0.9 0:00
> > mediaproxy.py
> >
> > During the test :
> >
> > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> > 13915 root 25 0 4864 4864 2068 R 99.9 0.9 0:31
> > mediaproxy.py
> >
> > After the test :
> >
> > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
> > 3356 root 15 0 1600 1600 1036 S 0.0 0.3 0:00 bash
> > 13915 root 15 0 4864 4864 2068 S 0.0 0.9 0:44
> > mediaproxy.py
> >
> > 0.9 % !!!!!
> >
> > I made the test a couples of times later and the %MEM used is
> > still 0.9%.
> > I guess that it was maybe a problem between the python2.3 and the
> > mediaproxy? Don't know...
> >
> > I'm going to change the python version in my production
> > machine. i'm going
> > to keep you inform about the results...
> >
> > Thanks to Lucas...again.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Ricardo Martinez.-
> >
> > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > De: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:rmartinez at redvoiss.net]
> > > Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Abril de 2005 17:33
> > > Para: 'Lucas Aimaretto'; serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of
> > > RAM resources.
> > >
> > >
> > > For example now i have 14 simultaneus calls.
> > >
> > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME
> > > CPU COMMAND
> > > 11760 root 15 0 601M 518M 2396 R 7.2
> > 51.4
> > > 69:10 0 mediaproxy.py
> > >
> > >
> > > When the active calls are 0 again the CPU % reach 0.2%, but
> > > the %MEM is
> > > greater than 51.4%, and always increasing..
> > > A couple of questions.
> > > How you launch mediaproxy?. And in your last mail what are
> > the pyhton
> > > proccess running.. i don't see the mediaproxy process running.
> > > Thanks again.
> > >
> > > Ricardo.-
> > >
> > > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > > De: Lucas Aimaretto [mailto:lucas at cyneric.com]
> > > > Enviado el: Viernes, 08 de Abril de 2005 17:20
> > > > Para: 'Ricardo Martinez'; serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy still consuming a lot of
> > > > RAM resources.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > But when you check the use of RAM memory in your machine...
> > > > > (maybe with the command "top" or the command "free") don't
> > > > > you notice a increasing amount of RAM used without being
> > > > > released? As i mentioned i have this problem.. this is a
> > > > > snippet of the output of the "top" command in my machine:
> > > > >
> > > > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME
> > > > > CPU COMMAND
> > > > > 11760 root 15 0 590M 516M 2396 S 0.9
> > > > 51.2
> > > > > 68:15 0 mediaproxy.py
> > > > >
> > > > > 51.2% of memory used? What version of pyhton are you using?,
> > > > > what OS are you using?. Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > Hey!, how many calls where you proxying when you had that usage of
> > > > memmory ?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Lucas
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > > > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.5 - Release Date:
> > > 07/04/2005
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050411/1e05ca1c/attachment.htm>