[Serusers] Child procs

[Greger V. Teigre]

Have you tried running ser in full debug mode, no-fork to see if you get a 
crash?  Maybe you have some inconsistency somewhere causing processes to go 
down where a certain function is called.
    Maybe you as an experiment should download the Getting Started SER 
source package and compile using the make_and_install script?   It could be 
a mysql library problem.  make_and_install will create a file with the 
output.  grep for 'error' and warning to catch any problems (caps too).
g-)

Matt Schulte wrote:
> Ok, here's a little more info. It seems that the procs are getting
> knocked off one by one at different places in the script. Sometimes
> it's a register, sometimes it's a reply (ack), random stuff. I have
> break; at each ending point, any suggestions?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger at teigre.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 1:30 PM
> To: Matt Schulte; serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Child procs
>
>
> Matt,
> Why do you believe that you have been running out of processes?  At
> any given time you may have processes without CPU load, but over time
> the processes should have some CPU time.
>    Have you run serctl ps? AFAIK, the standard number of processes for
> each
> protocol (udp/tcp) is 8 unless you specify children=x.
>
> If a ser process blocks due to problems with mysql or a radius
> failover situation, you may get a problem where all processes blocks.
> g-)
>
> Matt Schulte wrote:
>> bueller? someone must have some clue
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matt Schulte
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 7:26 AM
>> To: Matt Schulte; serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> Subject: RE: [Serusers] Child procs
>>
>>
>> Does anyone have any opinions on this? What I'm worried about is of
>> course running out of procs and thus hanging SER, I believed this to
>> have happened several times..
>>
>> Thanks..
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matt Schulte
>> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:45 AM
>> To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> Subject: [Serusers] Child procs
>>
>>
>> Do increasing child procs actually do anything? When I do a 'ps axu'
>> I
>
>> only show 4 of the procs having CPU time, the rest having no cpu time
>> at all. Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Matt
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers