[Serusers] onsip NAT doc

Java Rockx javarockx at gmail.com
Thu Apr 7 13:36:04 CEST 2005


I'm not 100% certain, but I thought Dan Pascu just committed some changes to 
the CVS head branch last week that accomodated this in the mediaproxy.so - 
again, I'm not 100% certain about this.

P

On Apr 7, 2005 1:31 AM, Greger V. Teigre <greger at teigre.com> wrote:
> 
> The nat=yes is specifically to catch re-INVITEs. You should therefore only
> test for its presence under the loose_route() section.
> g-)
> 
> Iqbal wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I was looking through the doc, and wanted to know do I need to lines
> > 64,65 and 84 (page 30)
> >
> > In line 64 I am testing for client_nat(3) and INVITE and then adding
> > record_route_preset header
> >
> > then in the loose_route section I am checking again for INVITE
> > nat_test(3) and seeing og nat=yes is added to route line, and then
> > setting the flag = 6, can I not just do this in line 65, i.e set the
> > flag above, and then in 84 say something like
> >
> > if isflagset(6) use mediaproxy
> >
> > Iqbal
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050407/a587f972/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list