[Serusers] rtpproxy locks up ser
Richard
richard at o-matrix.org
Thu Apr 7 10:34:50 CEST 2005
Thanks Jan. It is really good to know.
I tried udp, got quite a few udp connections even for a very low volume test
system, a netstat -na shows,
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:5059 0.0.0.0:*
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33098 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33099 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33100 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33101 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33102 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33103 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:33104 127.0.0.1:5059 ESTABLISHED
udp 0 0 66.1.2.7:35032 0.0.0.0:*
udp 0 0 66.1.2.7:35033 0.0.0.0:*
udp 0 0 66.1.2.7:35034 0.0.0.0:*
udp 0 0 66.1.2.7:35035 0.0.0.0:*
You can see only one rtpproxy session here. But there are a bunch of
connections for port 5059 which rtpproxy listens to.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Richard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan at iptel.org]
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 2:29 AM
> To: Richard
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] rtpproxy locks up ser
>
> Try to use UDP instead of unix domain sockets for the communication
> between ser and rtpproxy. The the rtpproxy blocks for some reason, UDP
> packets would be simply dropped and SER would continue to process
> another SIP request.
>
> Jan.
>
> On 30-03 10:22, Richard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't know if anyone has experienced this. The ser stops getting any
> > packets, ser log shows no activity. When I do "netstat -an", I got this,
> >
> > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
> State
> > udp 261580 0 80.1.2.3:5060 0.0.0.0:*
> > udp 85224 0 0.0.0.0:35940 0.0.0.0:*
> > udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:35941 0.0.0.0:*
> > udp 47704 0 0.0.0.0:35942 0.0.0.0:*
> > udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:35943 0.0.0.0:*
> >
> > I restarted ser several times, didn't help. So I restarted rtpproxy. Ser
> > started processing packets and the recv-q drops to 0. I wonder what
> could
> > cause recv-Q accumulating packets. Everything was running fine without
> any
> > problem for a long time. I haven't made any change to either ser or
> rtpproxy
> > recently.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
More information about the sr-users
mailing list