[Serusers] Proxy sending ACK on port 5060 instead of on contact port

[Jan Janak]

There is the same problem in BYE, even in the BYE sent by the calee.

  Jan.

On 15-09 12:44, Jan Janak wrote:
> The ACK from Sjphone is broken, it contains sip:202.125.84.163 in the
> Request-URI but the Request-URI should be sip:202.125.84.163:1585 (port
> is missing) because that's what the UA receives in 200 OK.
> 
>   Jan.
> 
> On 15-09 15:22, mahesh wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Zeus,
> > 
> > I am attaching the ethereal captures of both fw1 and fw2(on wan 
> > interfaces). Only relevant packets are shown in the capture to minimize the 
> > file size.
> > The NAT IP used by fw1 is 202.125.84.164 and the one used by fw2 is 
> > 202.125.84.163
> > 
> > regards
> > Mahesh
> > 
> > 
> > >Mahesh,
> > >
> > >Given that you have ethereal capture, send it in to the list and we can see
> > >what's happening.
> > >
> > >Zeus
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org
> > >> [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of mahesh
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2004 5:15 PM
> > >> To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > >> Subject: [Serusers] Proxy sending ACK on port 5060 instead of
> > >> on contact port
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I am using the following configuration to test SJPhone
> > >> through IPTEL proxy
> > >> server(publicly
> > >> available:195.37.77.99).
> > >>
> > >> HOST1(win2K)---FW1---Internet---FW2---HOST2(winXP)
> > >>
> > >> Host1 and Host2 are hosts with private IPs having SJPhone
> > >> application. FW1
> > >> and FW2 are
> > >> firewall/NAT devices with SIP-ALG implementation. This means
> > >> all the SIP
> > >> messages are modified to include the public IPs in them. Also the
> > >> via,contact ports are modified. Now both host1 and host2
> > >> register with the iptel proxy server. A call is initiated
> > >> from host1. Host2
> > >> sends 200 OK response
> > >> to the HOST1. After this the ACK sent by Host1 is sent to
> > >> port 5060 on
> > >> HOst2,instead of the
> > >> contact port advertised in 200 OK. This is observed from
> > >> ethereal captures
> > >> on Host2. All these
> > >> messages are going through the proxy server(195.37.77.99).
> > >>
> > >> Can someone please tell me why the proxy server is behaving
> > >> this way, i.e.
> > >> sending ACK on 5060
> > >> instead of the contact. Is there anything that i am missing
> > >> here or doing
> > >> wrong.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Mahesh
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Serusers mailing list
> > >> serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >>
> 
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers