[Serusers] Re: SER behind NAT , NEED HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jan Janak jan at iptel.org
Tue Sep 14 19:38:45 CEST 2004


The processing of BYEs in the proxy server should be exactly the same as
the processing of ACKs. If the ACK gets through then the BYE should get
through as well, unless you have a bug in your configuration file.

    Jan.

On 14-09 08:39, Andrés Parra L. wrote:
> Thanks Jan, I Have probed the
> record_route_preset("200.24.99.131:lr")
> The server answers with a 200(OK) to the INVITE
> Method, 
> but it doesn't to the BYE method, it responds a
> 408(Request Timeout).
> The ACK takes the route perfectly and it runs from UA
> to UA without any problems, however the Bye is
> received by the server(192.168.0.1) an then is sent to
> its  public IP address (200.24.99.131) there is
> something I think is a problem!!
> The server is unable to extract from the via field the
> public IP address in the BYE so, it keeps sending the
> BYE package to itself instead of the next hop that
> it's supposed to do.
> 
> Do you have any suggestions regarding this issue?
> Is there something wrong with the way i'm seeing
> things?
> I've been reading over and over the SIP RFC and i
> don't  
> understand the behaveour of the SIP Proxy in this
> particular case;
> 
> I'm currently using the 0.8.14. Should i use the CVS
> updated version??might there be a bug in the ftp
> version??
> 
> I have tested the (set_)advertised_address without
> success.
> 
> Thanks a lot for any information you could give me.
> I'll be waiting for your reply
> 
> Andres Parra
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> http://vote.yahoo.com




More information about the sr-users mailing list