[Serusers] fr_inv_timer

Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu at fokus.fraunhofer.de
Sun Oct 10 17:35:36 CEST 2004


yes, correct
bogdan

Richard wrote:
> final reply? So is it any response >=200?
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Bogdan-Andrei IANCU [mailto:iancu at fokus.fraunhofer.de]
>>Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 9:09 AM
>>To: Richard
>>Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] fr_inv_timer
>>
>>fr_timer is stopped when a final reply is received.
>>
>>bogdan
>>
>>Richard wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Can someone tell me what triggers to cancel the fr_inv_timer for
>>>INVITE? Is it 200 OK or ACK?
>>>
>>>I have a cpl with "force_stateful" doing ring both. So a call is
>>>parallel fork into two branches. When one phone is pickup, 200 OK and
>>>ACK are correctly delivered. The unused branch is also CANCEL-ed
>>>correctly. The problem is that somehow ser didn't stop the transaction
>>>timer for INVITE. After "fr_inv_timer" is timeout, ser sends a "487
>>>Request Cancelled" to the original caller and forces a disconnect.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Richard
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
> 
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list