[Serusers] SER + RTPProxy and Client behind NAT
Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya
mahesh at aptela.com
Mon Nov 22 00:00:18 CET 2004
I'm having a strange problem with getting SER+RTPProxy to work when the
UA is behind NAT
Setup is as follows
UA --> NAT1 --> SER+RTPProxy --> NAT2 --> Asterisk
I've got RTPProxy running in "bridge" mode, gatewaying 'tween Asterisk
and the Public Internet
SIP traffic all routes perfectly. STUN enabled clients work perfectly.
The problem is that if the outbound port on NAT1 for the RTP stream is
*different* from the outbound port from the UA, then RTPProxy persists
in sending the packets to the UA port, *not* the NAT1 port.
e.g.
if the SDP payload from the UA contains
c=IN IP4 192.168.5.100
m=audio 16396 RTP/AVP....
but NAT1 sends the RTP stream out on port 64003, then rtpproxy sends the
media from Asterisk back to port 16393 at NAT1, instead of to port 64003
at NAT1!
Is it supposed to do this? Am I missing something really obvious?
The relevant section from ser.cfg is as follows
if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) {
fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling
if (method == "INVITE") {
fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP
};
setflag(6); # Mark as NATed
};
};
rewritehostport("........");
if (force_rtp_proxy("FEI")) {
t_on_reply("4");
};
.
.
.
onreply_route[4] {
if (!(status=~"183" || status=~"200")) {
break;
};
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy("F");
break;
}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mahesh.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 332 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20041121/c52a3752/attachment.vcf>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list