[Serusers] Registration Timeout

[Jan Janak]

One small note to the topic. Registrar can shorten the expires value but
must not extend it. I made a mistake while implementing min_expires
parameter, the parameter would extend the expiration interval, but the
registrar should reject such a registration instead. This is what
RFC3261 says and I will change the registrar to reject such
registrations later.

  Jan.

On 15-11 09:34, Girish wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> --- Marian Dumitru <marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro> wrote:
> 
> > If you try your approach, it will be a discrepancy between what SER and 
> > the phones think the expire value is. SER will consider the one received 
> > in the original req. (it will ignore the new value forced from script 
> > via append_hf() ) and the client will consider the value received in 
> > reply ( the one forced from script via append_to_reply() ).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Yes. You are correct. RFC says that the registrar should honour the expires parameter/header in
> the REGISTER request. It can add an expires header if it is not present in the request. Our
> softphones dont send expires parameter in the requests, may be the reason why there are no issues.
> 
> > Best regards,
> > Marian
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> =====
> Girish Gopinath  <gr_sh2003 at yahoo.com>
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
> www.yahoo.com 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers