[Serusers] sems IVR plugin bug???

[Java Rockx]

Great. 

One thing I was thinking is that if most people need this value to be set smaller then someone
should commit a change to CVS this this at 8 to 10 rather than 20.

Thanks,
Paul

--- Richard <richard at o-matrix.org> wrote:

> Hi Java,
> 
> That value is to prevent double detection, i.e. the same key is detected
> twice. Too large, it runs the risk of not detecting the right key. To small,
> it increases the chance of double detection.
> 
> I use 7 or 8 in my system.
> 
> Richard
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
> > Behalf Of Java Rockx
> > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 5:44 PM
> > To: Java Rockx; ser users
> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] sems IVR plugin bug???
> > 
> > Hi All.
> > 
> > Perhaps I just fixed this, but will my change cause other problems? The
> > change I made was in
> > IvrDtmfDetector.h
> > 
> > I changed
> > 
> > DTMF_INTERVAL = 20
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > DTMF_INTERVAL = 10
> > 
> > And now dialing DTMF digits is ok. Will reducing DTMF_INTERVAL to 10 cause
> > other issues?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> > 
> > --- Java Rockx <javarockx at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello All.
> > >
> > > I'm using sems which I updated from berlios CVS tonight (2004-11-04).
> > >
> > > There appears to be a bug in the DTMF detection in the IVR plugin.
> > >
> > > Using the DTMF-detection.pl test script that ships with sems, DTMF
> > detection works fine for
> > > non-repeating digits. However, it always drops a digit if you repeat a
> > number.
> > >
> > > For example:
> > >
> > > GOOD ===> Press 123456 and the IVR plugin will receive 123456
> > > BAD  ===> Press 001122 the IVR plugin will receive 012
> > >
> > > I've tested this with my grandstream BT100 using DTMF mode as
> "in-audio",
> > "via RTP", and "via
> > > SIP
> > > INFO". The "in-audio" and "via RTP" both produce this problem while the
> > "via SIP INFO" digits
> > > are
> > > never detected (which is understandable).
> > >
> > > I searched the mailing list but found no reference to this problem.
> > >
> > > So the question is this; Does anyone have a patch to fix this?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
> > > www.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
> > www.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com