[Serusers] Timers

Jiri Kuthan jiri at iptel.org
Thu May 20 10:17:46 CEST 2004


At 07:51 AM 5/20/2004, Richard wrote:
>Hi Jiri,
>
>Thanks. Now I have a better understanding after
>reading some achieves. Still some questions. I believe
>that the workaround solution is to use stateless
>forwarding. If I have to use stateful forwarding
>(because of accounting), what options do I have? Is
>there a compile option to give the flexibility of
>multiple timeout value regardless of performance hit?
>Or have several steps of timeout values, like 30 sec,
>45 sec and 60 sec with each having its own queue? As
>you know, it doesn't need a granularity of seconds. Is
>it possible to use cpl-c script with configurable
>timeout numbers?

There is only single-timer value in the current SER code.
If all of your SER code uses stateful forwarding, it will
use a single timer. Use two SERs, use stateful forwarding
selectively, or wait till someone develops a different
timer system.

-jiri


>Cpl-c script gives the call control ability to users.
>>From a marketing point of view, it is a great feature.
>However without configurable timeout value support, it
>becomes less powerful...
>
>Thanks,
>Richard
>
>--- Jiri Kuthan <jiri at iptel.org> wrote:
>> No, see archives for explanation and workarounds.
>> -jiri
>> 
>> 
>> >--- GR S <gr_sh2003 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> Folks,
>> >> 
>> >> Is it possible to set different timers for
>> different INVITEs using fr_invite_timer (or
>> >> by
>> >> using any other feature)?. I'm using
>> fr_invite_timer and I can direct the calls to
>> >> voicemail or other extensions, if the callee
>> doesn't pick up the phone after ringing
>> >> for
>> >> 10 secs. But this is common for all the INVITEs
>> that SER receives. Can I set different
>> >> timer intervals for different extensions? Say 10
>> secs for extension '1001', 15 secs for
>> >> '1002' etc..
>> >> 
>> >> I searched the archives, and found a post by Jan,
>> saying that it is in the TODO list.
>> >> Just curious about the progress of that. Is the
>> feature implemented? If not, can I
>> >> acheive this by using failure_routing or any
>> other means?
>> >> 
>> >> TIA, Girish
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >
>> >
>> >=====
>> >Regards, Girish
>> >
>> >
>> >        
>> >                
>> >__________________________________
>> >Do you Yahoo!?
>> >SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
>> >http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Serusers mailing list
>> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>> 
>> --
>> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/ 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>        
>                
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Domains ­ Claim yours for only $14.70/year
>http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/ 




More information about the sr-users mailing list