[Serusers] fix_nated_sdp bug or ser.cfg error??

Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu at fokus.fraunhofer.de
Fri May 7 15:27:38 CEST 2004


Hi jimmy,

The problem is in your config file - lines 95 and 96 :
fix_nated_sdp("3");
force_rtp_proxy();

both functions rewrites the IP from "c=", so.... you saw the result.
fix_nated_sdp("3") should be fix_nated_sdp("1") not to alter the IP, and
let force_rtp_proxy() to do it.

Regards,
Bogdan

jimmy huang wrote:

> Hi all
> I am trying ser+nathelper+rtpproxy
> ser is downloaded form CVS on 2004/04/22
> my environment is just like
> nec-----------------Internet---------------ser+nathelper+rtpproxy---------------NAT-------------------jimmy
> 61.61.61.3 61.61.61.1 192.168.5.1 61.61.61.2 192.168.5.2
> both client use kphone4.02 , Symmetric Signaling ,Symmetric Media
> when jimmy call nec ,and after nec answer the call , kphone will crash...
> I think it may be something wrong..
> so i check the package...
> the 200 OK with SDP after ser to jimmy is correct ,
> Connection Information (c): IN IP4 61.61.61.1
> but the SDP of INVITE request after ser to nec
> the part of rtp will occur some incorrcet information
> Connection Information (c): IN IP4 61.61.61.261.61.61.1
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this is not correct
> I don't know if this is a bug , or some thing wrong in my ser.cfg
> can anyone tell me where is wrong in my ser.cfg ???
> thanks
> jimmy
> ser.cfg==========================================================================
> # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
> #debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
> #fork=yes
> #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E)
> #/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode
> debug=4
> #fork=no
> log_stderror=yes
> #*/
> check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
> dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
> rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
> #port=5060
> #children=4
> fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
> # ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
> #++++++++++ jimmy added ++++++++++++++++++
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
> loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
> #----------------------------------------------------
> # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
> #++++++++++ jimmy added ++++++++++++++++++
> #we will you flag 6 to mark NATed contacts
> modparam("registrar","nat_flag",6)
> #Enable NAT pinging
> modparam("nathelper","natping_interval",3)
> #ping only contacts that are known to be behind NAT
> modparam("nathelper","ping_nated_only",1)
> #----------------------------------------------------
> # -- usrloc params --
> modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
> # -- rr params --
> # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
> modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
> # ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
> # main routing logic
> route{
> #++++++++++ jimmy added ++++++++++++++++++
> if(nat_uac_test("3"))
> {
> if((method == "REGISTER") || !(search("^Record-Route:")))
> {
> log("LOG:Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n");
>
> fix_nated_contact();
> if(method == "INVITE")
> {
> fix_nated_sdp("3");
> force_rtp_proxy();
> t_on_reply("1");
> };
> force_rport();
> setflag(6);
> };
> };
> #----------------------------------------------------
> # initial sanity checks -- messages with
> # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
> break;
> };
> if ( msg:len > max_len ) {
> sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
> break;
> };
> # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
> # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
> # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
> # use different transport protocol
> record_route();
> # loose-route processing
> if (loose_route()) {
> t_relay();
> break;
> };
> # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc
> # (in case, it does not work, use the following command
> # with proper names and addresses in it)
> if (uri==myself) {
> if (method=="REGISTER") {
> save("location");
> break;
> };
> # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB
> if (!lookup("location")) {
> sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
> break;
> };
> };
> # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that
> # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP
> if (!t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> };
> }
>
> route[1]
> {
> if(uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.16)" && !search("^Route:"))
> {
> sl_send_reply("479","we don't forward to private IP address");
> break;
> };
> if(isflagset(6))
> {
> force_rtp_proxy();
> t_on_reply("1");
> append_hf("P-Behind-NAT: Yes\r\n");
> }
>
> if(!t_relay())
> {
> sl_reply_error();
> break;
> }
> }
> onreply_route[1]
> {
> if(status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]")
> {
> fix_nated_contact();
> force_rtp_proxy();
> };
> }
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>  
>




More information about the sr-users mailing list