[Serusers] asterisk server
F.S.Salloum
ssal at intracom.gr
Sat Mar 27 14:53:58 CET 2004
Dear Eugene,
I have used both and currently i'm doing some stress tests in both of them,
I think the best solution is to combine them, SER is excellent for the
SIP stuff, can work as a SIP proxy and whatevere else you want with the
modules which supports (sms gw etc) Asterisk in the other hand works
fine as a SIP to ISDN/CAPI Gateway and an IVR system (better and faster
compared with the sems+ser solution until version 0.8.12).
Regarding the underlying code SER is a reference for any programmer out
there, it is very good written and includes some excellent methods for
faster execution. Asterisk as far i know is almost a one man show and
the code it is not so nice written (for sip you can check the code
channels/chan_sip.c and you will understand what i mean) so it is more
difficult to add some staff there for the near future compared with SER
which can be maintained more easily.
Sotiris
Eugene Babchin wrote:
> Is anybody here experienced with Asterisk server and what is you
> experience? What pluses and minuses for SIP from IPTEL and from Asterisk?
> Thanks,
> Eugene.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20040327/2d2ec105/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list