[Serusers] Re: Serusers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 31

Sun Jun 27 12:56:27 CEST 2004

Great and Thanks for a early response.

regrads
ragha

----- Original Message -----
From: serusers-request at lists.iptel.org
Date: Sunday, June 27, 2004 6:00 pm
Subject: Serusers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 31

> Send Serusers mailing list submissions to
> 	serusers at lists.iptel.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	serusers-request at lists.iptel.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	serusers-owner at lists.iptel.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Serusers digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. non-unique call id problem (Greg Fausak)
>   2. Re: non-unique call id problem (GR S)
>   3. Re: Download help (Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul)
>   4. Re: Replacing URI (Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul)
>   5. Re: non-unique call id problem (Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul)
>   6. Re: aa - Application Agent (Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul)
>   7. Re: setflag() clarification (Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul)
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 18:22:45 -0500
> From: Greg Fausak <greg at addabrand.com>
> Subject: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
> To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Message-ID: <BB1A78F0-C7C7-11D8-A098-000A95ACCFB2 at addabrand.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> 
> I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
> SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique?  Has
> anyone else messed with this?  It is a big accounting problem!
> 
> -g
> 
> 
> Greg Fausak
> www.AddaBrand.com
> (US) 469-546-1265
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
> From: GR S <gr_sh2003 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
> To: Greg Fausak <greg at addabrand.com>
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Message-ID: <20040627083547.79042.qmail at web54007.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Greg,
> 
> We experienced similer problems when we tried to parallelly fork 
> calls thru our PSTN gateway. All the calls had same call-id, and 
> the only difference was the branch-id's in the via headers of the 
> forked calls. The gateway accepted only the first call and 
> rejected others. I asked about this in the sipping forum, and was 
> informed that it could be a bug in the implementation of the UA 
> server (PSTN gateways are UAS). The UAS has to consider branch-
> id's for the transactions. AFAIK, for a proxy, it is the 
> combination of the Call-ID and the tags that uniquely identify the 
> dialog. (Request others to correct if i am wrong on this). Not 
> sure what exactly is your problem.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Greg Fausak <greg at addabrand.com> wrote:
> I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
> SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique? Has
> anyone else messed with this? It is a big accounting problem!
> 
> -g
> 
> Greg Fausak
> 
> 
> Girish Gopinath  <gr_sh2003 at yahoo.com>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: /pipermail/serusers/attachments/20040627/4c2f0314/attachment-
> 0001.html
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:26:04 +0200
> From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Download help
> To: RaghavendraK 70574 <raghavendrak at huawei.com>
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Message-ID: <20040627092604.GA3008 at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Jun 26, 2004 at 10:39, RaghavendraK 70574 
> <raghavendrak at huawei.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I want to download the src from windows. Can please help me, i 
> don't have cvs client on windows machine and my linux has not net 
> connectivity. I have gone through the help, but setting the env to 
> pserver can be done in unix kind of env. Please let me know if i 
> can get any tar or gzip version of the src code.
> > 
> 
> Try
> http://www.iptel.org/~andrei/ser_tarballs/stable/  for stable 
> branch cvs
> tarballs (daily built)
> 
> or
> 
> http://www.iptel.org/~andrei/ser_tarballs/unstable/ for unstable
> 
> 
> Andrei
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:35:53 +0200
> From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Replacing URI
> To: Mark Wehberg <mark.wehberg at clearviewcatv.net>
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Message-ID: <20040627093553.GB3008 at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Jun 25, 2004 at 10:26, Mark Wehberg 
> <mark.wehberg at clearviewcatv.net> wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > I am trying to change the URI within the ser.cfg using the replace
> > command.  Has anyone done this before?  What I need to do is 
> strip some
> > of the info after the "@" and forward the message back out.  So, 
> I can't
> > necessarily use the rewritehostport (or rewritehost, rewriteport)
> > commands.  Ay help would be greatly appreciated..
> 
> 
> replace does not work on uris (it will ignore the first line).
> 
> To change the uri use subst_uri (textops modules).
> 
> Example:
> 
> subst_uri('/(.*)@foo.bar/\1_foo at bar.com/i');
> 
> (where the last i means case insensitive)
> 
> 
> 
> Andrei
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:42:15 +0200
> From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] non-unique call id problem
> To: Greg Fausak <greg at addabrand.com>
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Message-ID: <20040627094215.GC3008 at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Jun 26, 2004 at 18:22, Greg Fausak <greg at addabrand.com> wrote:
> > I am seeing non-unique call IDs from a UA.
> > SHould I reject a call if the Call-ID is not unique?  Has
> > anyone else messed with this?  It is a big accounting problem!
> 
> What do you mean by non-unique call id? Is it changing during the 
> call?(the call id is supposed to change for each new call)
> 
> 
> Andrei
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:43:56 +0200
> From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] aa - Application Agent
> To: Jev <jev at ecad.org>
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Message-ID: <20040627094356.GD3008 at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Jun 24, 2004 at 11:22, Jev <jev at ecad.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > At what stage in development is the Application Agent (aa)? Is 
> there a 
> > functioning b2bua yet?
> 
> Yes, aa is functioning, however aa is available only under a comercial
> licence from iptel (it's not free).
> 
> 
> Andrei
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:46:07 +0200
> From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul <pelinescu-onciul at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] setflag() clarification
> To: Jev <jev at ecad.org>
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Message-ID: <20040627094607.GE3008 at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Jun 25, 2004 at 09:56, Jev <jev at ecad.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The functions;
> > 
> > setflag()
> > restflag()
> > isflagset()
> > 
> > Do these functions set a flag identified by the numeric 
> argument, or do 
> > they set one specific flag to the value of the argument?
> > 
> > I'm sure it is the former, but the docs are not that clear to me 
> on this.
> > 
> > Also, if I update the docs, where is the best place for me to 
> submit 
> > changes to? Shall I just email the sgml diffs to the serdev list?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrei
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 
> End of Serusers Digest, Vol 14, Issue 31
> ****************************************
> 