[Serusers] Mediaproxy | none of caller or called party is local

dhiraj.2.bhuyan at bt.com dhiraj.2.bhuyan at bt.com
Wed Jun 16 17:16:52 CEST 2004


Thanks Adrian.
Its working now :)
I missed the db_url bit for the domain module in ser.cfg
 
Regards,
 
Dhiraj

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Georgescu [mailto:ag at ag-projects.com]
Sent: 16 June 2004 13:42
To: Bhuyan,D,Dhiraj,XSG1 R
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Mediaproxy | none of caller or called party is local



Dhiraj, 


Mediaproxy is looking in From: and To: Make sure the domains of either user is in ser domain table 


Example: For user 1234 at bt.com 


serctl domain add bt.com 



Adrian 


-------- 


Hello List, 


I am trying to set up the following senario - 



[kphone A]-----------[ser/mediaproxy A]---------------------[ser/mediaproxy B]-----------[kphone B] 



When I try to set up a call between the two ends, proxydispatcher complains that "none of the caller or called party is local. will not use mediaproxy". 


I am not using DNS SRV at the moment - instead will be using the default unix socket. 


Kphone A and B are registered respectively to ser/mediaproxy A and B respectively. Anybody has any hint where this thing might be failing? I tried to go through the code - but python is not one stronghold. How does the dispatcher decide whether "caller or called" party is local? 



Thanks for your help, 



Dhiraj Bhuyan 

Network Security Specialist, 

BT Exact Business Assurance Solutions 


Tel: +44 1473 643932 

Mob: +44 7962 012145 

Email: dhiraj.2.bhuyan at bt.com 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20040616/a05dd418/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list