[Serusers] can SER do network call forwarding?

Adrian Georgescu ag at ag-projects.com
Mon Jun 14 10:16:16 CEST 2004


On Jun 14, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:

> Adrian Georgescu writes:
>
>> A SIP provider has interconnect from incumbent PSTN operator (Cisco
>> gateway) using SIP (SER installation). This provider has an E164
>> number range placed in ENUM. The problem here is that when an ENUM
>> number is resolved to a remote domain and the destination username is
>> an alias on the remote domain, the provider proxy will pass the
>> redirect back to gateway who in term makes the final call.
>
> it is not a good idea to let the gw to process the redirect, since if
> call is coming from pstn to a sip user and the sip user has redirect to
> expensive 700 number, the gateway would need to pay for the new leg.
> but as i tried to explained earlier, i don't think that it is a good
> idea for the proxy to process it either, since again, who would pay for
> the new leg if it would go to a 700 number?  legally the user who has
> placed redirect in his or her sip phone cannot be charged for the
> redirect.



As with any numbering plan, this is configured based on destination 
URI, the decision is made in ser.cfg  whether to proxy or not. 
Depending on the peering with other you may take different decisions 
which fit your business plan.

>
>> This provider gets paid by the incumbent for terminating minutes on IP
>> for those E164 numbers but as the proxy is not in the middle they do
>> not know how much traffic their numbers generated for anything that is
>> an alias. The problem in this case is accounting. The Proxy should 
>> stay
>> in the middle of the dialog in this scenario so your function makes
>> perfect sense.
>
> the proxy would stay in the middle if the proxy is serving the domains
> enum queries return.  so i don't quite understand your example.
>
>> This scenario is described very nice in this document.
>
> it is not clear from the document, why the 302 can't go all the way to
> A, i.e., what the benefit is for the proxy handling the redirect.  if
> the proxy is A's outbound proxy, it would get the new invite too.  if
> not, there is nothing the provider can do about it, since use of an
> outbound proxy is user's own choice.

Do you know do you set a Cisco gateway to use Outbound gateway? Maybe 
this is the best answer for the problem.

>
> -- juha




More information about the sr-users mailing list