[Serusers] which ver of rtpproxy with ser0.8.12 from src on FreeBSD4.9 ??

[Tjapko Smits]

Adrian, 

I am not an expert but spent the last 3 weeks fighting with both. :-) In
short the difference between mediaproxy and rtpproxy (nathelper)  that
it are both mecahnisms to transparently penetrate symmetric nat in
conjuction with ser and with some help also a-symmetric. Mediaproxy can
make use of multiple proxyservers to balance your proxied traffic. Also
mediaproxy tries to move the complex logic of the decision in the module
or the proxy servers , unlike the nathelper module which has most of the
decision logic in the many options you can pass to its various
functions. 

Both are working well although i have the feeling that there is way more
experience with nathelper on this list. My choice is mediaproxy because
i need to handle a very high volume of nated ep's that i like to balance
over different proxy servers. 

These were my 5 cents on your question.. 

Tjapko. 


 

On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 21:42, Adrian Acosta wrote:
> Hello Guys: i am running ser0.8.12 installed from source on a FreeBSD
> 4.9 machine. Where do you recommend to download rtpproxy from??? What
> are the differencies between mediaproxy and rtpproxy??
>  
> kind regards, Adrian
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers