[Serusers] t_check_status/t_on_failure does not work with ser v.0.8.12 rpm

David Lee d16lee at ryerson.ca
Fri Jul 30 17:05:05 CEST 2004


Hi Bogdan,

We upgraded to v0.8.14, and t_check_status works as you described, and perfectly for what we want to accomplish.

Thank you,

Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: Bogdan-Andrei IANCU <iancu at fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Thursday, July 29, 2004 3:19 am
Subject: Re: [Serusers] t_check_status/t_on_failure does not work with ser v.0.8.12 rpm

> David Lee wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > In the admin documentation of ser, it says that all messages 
> greater than 300 are considered failures when using t_on_failure.
> > 
> > In our scenario, we would like the ability to forward to a voice 
> mail on 4xx failure, but not on 302 failure.  We are using XTEN 
> Pro softphones and want to be able to allow users the 
> functionality to forward to another SIP url (uses 302).  But when 
> ser is seeing 302 (and t_on_failure is active) it considers it a 
> failure and immediately runs failure route block (to voicemail).  
> So our users cannot using forwarding to URL.
> > 
> > An example would be ... When I'm out for lunch I would like to 
> forward my line to my secretary first before going to voicemail.
> > 
> > We saw some mention of t_check_status ... but ser wont start 
> with that in the cfg.  We are using ser  v.0.8.12 rpm.  Is that in 
> a unstable version only.  If some could post how to accomplish 
> this it would be appreciated.
> 
> yes, indeed, the answer is t_on_failure - this function didn't 
> existed 
> in the original release 0.8.12 (so, not present in rpm), but you 
> can 
> find it in the cvs tree of 0.8.12 - so, get the sources from cvs.
> 
> bogdan
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list