FW: [Serusers] Why ser is not a B2BUA

[Vitaly Nikolaev]

-----Original Message-----
From: Vitaly Nikolaev 
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 10:15 AM
To: 'daniel at iptel.org'
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Why ser is not a B2BUA



SER B2BUA is mif, anybody ever seen it ? only webpage on the site.
Iptel ignoring all my inquires about this product.

Can anybody recommend me commercial B2BUA ? Or trik how can I get one
from iptel? I really need id ASAP.

Thank you



-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 5:21 AM
To: ser
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Why ser is not a B2BUA

On 7/23/2004 8:24 AM, ser wrote:

> What is the missing functionnality that miss to ser to be a B2BUA ??
>
The functionality missing is the B2BUA functionality ;-) . If you look 
for a commercial solution of B2BUA, see http://www.iptel.org/aa/.

> (i was sure it could work in statefull mode).
>
It works in satefull mode -- transaction statefull -- using tm module.

Daniel

>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers