Fw: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy

[dhiraj.2.bhuyan at bt.com]

The SER/modules/mediaproxy/Readme contains a detailed comparison.

http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/modules/mediaproxy/Readme?rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup


Dhiraj

-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org]On Behalf Of Jan Janak
Sent: 23 July 2004 10:06
To: Gustavo Russo
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy


Adrian and Dan described the main differences from nathelper module when
they announced mediaproxy, you can find the email in the archives of the
mailing list. You can also find some information on their webpage. What
additional comparison do you want ?

If it is not enough then try both of them, write some comparison and
send it to the list.

Regarding the directions of the projects, it would be better to have
just one module for NAT traversal, but we were unable to resolve some
conflicts between the two modules so we decided to include both of them
and give users the possibility to choose. Both modules do approximately
the same, mediaproxy is simpler to setup, nathelper gives you more
flexibility but is more complicated to setup.

   Jan.

On 22-07 20:15, Gustavo Russo wrote:
> Arne :
> 
>  Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar
> question, in every case nobody answered.
> 
>  It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and
> mediaproxy,  many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing
> the two.
> 
>  Regards,
> Gustavo Russo
> 
> 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer at ritstele.com>
> > To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM
> > Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with
> > mediaproxy and rtpproxy ?
> >
> > >From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to
> > have multiple mediaproxies.
> > (sonds good)
> >
> > On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I
> > get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ?
> >
> > I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head.
> >
> > I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech
> > ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables).
> >
> > What is the most compatible solution at present ?
> >
> > thanks in advance,
> > Arne.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers