RES: [Serusers] problem with desc_time_order parameter?

Jimes Vasco Milanez jimes at cpqd.com.br
Wed Jul 14 15:39:38 CEST 2004


Hi Jan

> On 16-06 16:53, Jimes Vasco Milanez wrote:
> > Hi all
> > 
> > I noticed that the desc_time_order parameter of the 
> registrar module (in ser.cfg) doesn't seem to work as it 
> should (according to the description in the registrar manual).
> > If I understood correctly, if desc_time_order = 1 (using 
> modparam) the newest contact should be used among those of 
> same priority (I'm using the append_branches parameter equal to 0).
> 
>   What exactly does not work, could you give me an example ?

not the newest contact is used for calling in the case of logging on from two softphones. In the tests that I've performed, if I log from two softphones (We are using X-Lite) not necessarily the calls arrive to that latest logged in. (using the configuration mentioned above)


> > Another doubt is whether it is possible or not to use 
> append_branches=1 to do priority-driven forking (all contacts 
> are receiving the request, no matter which is their priority; 
> is it possible to limit the forking just to those of same 
> priority (q)? or even something better? :-) )
> 
>   No.

thanks!

Jimes




More information about the sr-users mailing list