RES: [Serusers] problem with desc_time_order parameter?
Jimes Vasco Milanez
jimes at cpqd.com.br
Wed Jul 14 15:39:38 CEST 2004
Hi Jan
> On 16-06 16:53, Jimes Vasco Milanez wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I noticed that the desc_time_order parameter of the
> registrar module (in ser.cfg) doesn't seem to work as it
> should (according to the description in the registrar manual).
> > If I understood correctly, if desc_time_order = 1 (using
> modparam) the newest contact should be used among those of
> same priority (I'm using the append_branches parameter equal to 0).
>
> What exactly does not work, could you give me an example ?
not the newest contact is used for calling in the case of logging on from two softphones. In the tests that I've performed, if I log from two softphones (We are using X-Lite) not necessarily the calls arrive to that latest logged in. (using the configuration mentioned above)
> > Another doubt is whether it is possible or not to use
> append_branches=1 to do priority-driven forking (all contacts
> are receiving the request, no matter which is their priority;
> is it possible to limit the forking just to those of same
> priority (q)? or even something better? :-) )
>
> No.
thanks!
Jimes
More information about the sr-users
mailing list