[Serusers] Parallel forking and reply error

[Jan Janak]

This is not possible because the config script will be executed for the
first branch only, thus you couldn't implement any per-branch policy.

  Jan.

On 30-06 10:16, Zappasodi Daniele wrote:
> Hi, all
> I'm implementing a black list, the control access to the gateway and other
> control policies and I have a problem with the call forking.
> In case of a call that generates a parallel forking I want the capability to
> select if accept or refuse the call for each single contact, but if the
> first reply that I send to the caller is an error message 4xx, the UA caller
> shuts down the call. 
> What would I have to do to add my reject (caused by my access control
> policy) to the call forking administration and so reply an error only if all
> contacts can not be reachable?
> I'm trying to implement a solution to reply an error only if all the
> contacts can not be reachable. 
> To do this thing I need to know the number of contacts that the lookup
> function has found for the request-uri that is arrived ( Is it possible to
> know if I have a single contact or a parallel forking?) and, if there are
> more than one contact associated to the sip uri, how can I go to serve the
> next contact in list without sending a reply for the destinations that I
> have to block?
> Any suggestion?
> 
> Thanks 
> Daniele

> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers