[Serusers] Ser and new Mediaproxy

[Adrian Georgescu]

 From what you describe there is little or no problems related to NAT 
transversal but rather with the basic SER signaling setup. I would 
suggest if I may to try spending more time and get experienced with how 
SER works or get some consultant on board.

Adrian

On Jul 2, 2004, at 6:54 PM, Tjapko ITS Consult at ncy wrote:

> Hi,
>
>  Thanks for answering. We use the mediaproxy module from unstable 
> version from last cvs and use SER version 0.8.12 from cvs on freeBSD 
> 5.1.
>
> We did exactly like the readme for the new mediaproxy says to install 
> the last version correctly. It is working fine but we have 2 problems:
>
>  1. When using the mediaproxy ser.cfg example file it will start ok 
> but right after call setup the ser will go into an indefinite loop.
>
>  2. When using a somewhat more developed ser.cfg we have some 
> problems: ser receive ACK from calling endpoint but it will not 
> forward it to called endpoint, so called endpoint will not open RTCP 
> streams for audio. It looks like ACK is losts somewhere on ser. This 
> happens not always but under certain conditions.
>
>  Both might be errors in our ser.cfg but we seem to overlook it. We 
> spent 2 weeks into this problem now and appreciate any further 
> comments that can lead to a solution. Any working example for ser with 
> mediaproxy will do.
>
>  We can sent you the other ser.cfg, dumps whatever if you like to take 
> a look at it.
>
>  Kindest regards, Tjapko.
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org]On 
> Behalf Of Adrian Georgescu
> Sent: Viernes, 02 de Julio de 2004 12:26 p.m.
> To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] Ser and new Mediaproxy
>
> Tjapko ,
>
> There is no syntax change for ser.cfg in the latest version of 
> MediaProxy.
>
> Adrian
>
> ----
> Hello ,
>
>  Can someone provide me full working ser.cfg example for latest version
> of Mediaproxy (example distributed with new mediaproxy does not seem to
> work properly). Herunder you will find the test.cfg that we use.
>
> Regards, Tjapko.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 2826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20040702/2aceb88d/attachment.bin>