[Fwd: Re: [Serusers] SER on port xxxx to SER on port 5060]

[Bogdan-Andrei IANCU]

just put both lines:
port=5060
port=5090
and you will have one ser listening on both ports.

bogdan

Aldo Armiento wrote:

>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     Re: [Serusers] SER on port xxxx to SER on port 5060
> Date:     Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:56:50 +0200
> From:     Aldo Armiento <aldo at cerca.com>
> Organization:     Cerca.com s.r.l.
> To:     daniel at iptel.org
> References:     <40E34AFC.40309 at armiento.com> 
> <40E3C3E1.6010300 at iptel.org>
>
>
>
> Dear Daniel,
> ok, i known "port" in global config. My question is: how can I tell 
> (routing rules) to "fake" ser at port 5090 to work as "proxy" for 
> "real" ser at port 5060?
>
> UA(1) --> NAT --> SER (5090) --> SER (5060) --> NAT --> UA(2)
>           |
>           |--> this NAT currupts packets to port 5060 (!!)
>                so I have to use another port but I want other
>                "normal" UA (with or without a good nat) work on
>                port 5060.
>
> Thanks you!!
>
> Aldo.
>
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> use port=5090 in your ser.cfg config file -- in global configuration 
>> parameters section.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 7/1/2004 1:21 AM, Aldo Armiento wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all!
>>> Some my sip clients are behind a  nat on an internet public network 
>>> that "corrupt" UDP packect (wrong checksum) if is directed to port 
>>> 5060.
>>> Is possible to have a SER on port (for example) 5090 as a "proxy" 
>>> for the real ser on port 5060? How I have to configure ser.cfg for 
>>> "fake" ser on port 5090?
>>>
>>> Thanks you,
>>> Aldo.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>