[Fwd: Re: [Serusers] SER on port xxxx to SER on port 5060]

[Aldo Armiento]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [Serusers] SER on port xxxx to SER on port 5060
Date: 	Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:56:50 +0200
From: 	Aldo Armiento <aldo at cerca.com>
Organization: 	Cerca.com s.r.l.
To: 	daniel at iptel.org
References: 	<40E34AFC.40309 at armiento.com> <40E3C3E1.6010300 at iptel.org>



Dear Daniel,
ok, i known "port" in global config. My question is: how can I tell 
(routing rules) to "fake" ser at port 5090 to work as "proxy" for "real" 
ser at port 5060?

UA(1) --> NAT --> SER (5090) --> SER (5060) --> NAT --> UA(2)
           |
           |--> this NAT currupts packets to port 5060 (!!)
                so I have to use another port but I want other
                "normal" UA (with or without a good nat) work on
                port 5060.

Thanks you!!

Aldo.

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

> Hello,
> use port=5090 in your ser.cfg config file -- in global configuration 
> parameters section.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On 7/1/2004 1:21 AM, Aldo Armiento wrote:
> 
>> Hi all!
>> Some my sip clients are behind a  nat on an internet public network 
>> that "corrupt" UDP packect (wrong checksum) if is directed to port 5060.
>> Is possible to have a SER on port (for example) 5090 as a "proxy" for 
>> the real ser on port 5060? How I have to configure ser.cfg for "fake" 
>> ser on port 5090?
>>
>> Thanks you,
>> Aldo.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>