[Serusers] failure route and ERROR: t_should_relay: status rewriteby UAS: stored: 408, received: 487

Jiri Kuthan jiri at iptel.org
Thu Jan 29 21:58:40 CET 2004


At 08:04 PM 1/29/2004, David R. Kompel wrote:
>I'm glad this issue was brought up when it was, cause I was just about
>to post on it :) I am using the same trick for voice mail. The problem
>is, if the user is busy, there is no way to detect it, since
>t_on_failure doesn't call the failure_route[x], if only one of the forks
>in the dset gets an error from the UAS.
>
>It would be nice to see a way that the failure_route could get called if
>any fork gets an error, and had a way to test for other existing forks,
>and cancel them, and then re-direct the call.

I am not sure if there is a benefit in forking to N destinations and giving 
on N-1 of them if one fails... what is the use case? (I naively thought you
fork in parallel to try as many destinations as you wish and fall back to
other alternative such as voicemail only if none of these original destinations 
succeded.)

-jiri  




More information about the sr-users mailing list