[Serusers] append_hf before sl_send_reply?

[Ulrich Abend]

Thanks, Bogdan!

This was probably what Marcello looked for.

Uli.

On Thursday 22 January 2004 12:25, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> append_hf() appends header to the current processed request and it will
> not be reflected on the replies; only in the forwarded request.
> If you want to add something to the reply, use append_to_reply()
> function. All changes introduced by this function will be reflected only
> on all replies for the current request.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> Ulrich Abend wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >could someone please give a statement on this:
> >
> >If you use append_hf before a sl_send_reply (code 302), the appended HF is
> > not included in the message. Is this behaviour intented or is it a bug?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Uli.
> >
> >----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
> >
> >Subject: Re: Sorry to bother you
> >Date: Wednesday 21 January 2004 16:47
> >From: Marcello Lupo <lupo at itspecialist.it>
> >To: Ulrich Abend <ullstar at iptel.org>
> >
> >Hio Ulrich,
> >thank you for the answer.
> >YEs you get the problem.
> >
> >For the original header field i was making a mistake, it only do not
> > append addedd field (CC-Diversion) in this case.
> >
> >This is the answer of the SER with the  Moved Temporarly:
> >
> >***********************************************+
> >
> >U 194.244.164.13:5060 -> 194.244.164.14:5060
> >  SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
> > 194.244.164.14:5060..From: "anonymous" <sip:194.244.164.14>;tag=9B2BDCC
> >  8-1BD2..To:
> ><sip:0350545048 at 194.244.164.13>;tag=da45cd22c5a2c167d6e0afbf7b99da4a.4b46.
> >.Ca ll-ID: 62E20996-453F11D6-9D4FFB
> >  9A-B058E7F8 at 194.244.164.14..CSeq: 101 INVITE..Contact:
> >sip:390457156862 at 194.244.164.14:5060..Server: Sip EXpress router
> >  (0.8.11 (i386/linux))..Content-Length: 0..Warning: 392
> > 194.244.164.13:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:  pid=27841 req_src_ip=
> >  194.244.164.14 req_src_port=50410
> > in_uri=sip:0350545048 at 194.244.164.13:5060
> > out_uri=sip:390457156862 at 194.244.164.14:5060
> >   via_cnt==1"....
> >*************************************************
> >
> >YEs the CC-Diversion field is not appended even if i specify it in the
> >configuration with append_urihf or append_hf .
> >I uset this command syntax:
> >
> >append_hf("CC-Diversion:<sip:0350545048 at 390350545001.lea-d.net:5060>;reaso
> >n=u nconditional\r\n");
> >
> >When i use it in a new call it is appended, but with the sl_send_reply it
> > is not.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Bye,
> >MArcello
> >
> >On Wednesday 21 January 2004 16:09, you wrote:
> >>Hi Marcello,
> >>
> >>On Tuesday 20 January 2004 22:13, Marcello Lupo wrote:
> >>>Hi Ulrich,
> >>>i hope you remember me... Marcello from Italy.
> >>
> >>Of course, I remember ;-)
> >>
> >>>today i wrote an e-mail on the mailing list but don't received any
> >>>answer.
> >>
> >>You will receive an answer for shure, but sometimes it may take a little.
> >>
> >>A short look into the sources showed me, that the sl_send_reply function
> >>_should_ include the original header fields for any code between 300 and
> >>400. From your mail I understand it does not, right?
> >>
> >>From your mail in serusers I understand that you only have the problem
> >>left, that the CC-diversion field is not present, even if you specify
> >>append-HF in the script?
> >>
> >>If that is the problem, you probably have to add the required
> >> functionality in the sl module. Maybe this is also a bug. (~ line 175 in
> >>modules/sl/sl_funcs.c)
> >>
> >>Please send your problem again, if I misunderstood you, I will take a
> >>closer look at it tomorrow.
> >>
> >>Uli.
> >>
> >>>I'm crushing my head to find out a way to let SER to answer to a call
> >>>with a 302 Moved temporarly and the request appended to it with the
> >>>addendum of the CC-Diversion field so our gateway (cisco 3725) can
> >>>correctly take the CC-Diversion field and put the number in the
> >>>Redirecting Number in the ISDN setup.
> >>>I tried to do it on a normal call but seems that the cisco ignore teh
> >>>CC-DIversion field.
> >>>From the documentatio i read it take in consideration the CC-Diversion
> >>>only if it receive a 3xx answer.
> >>>I tried to use the sl_send_reply function but it answer to cisco without
> >>>appending the original request and any field i specify with append_hf or
> >>>append_urihf.
> >>>Can you help me?
> >>>Thanks a lot,
> >>>Bye,
> >>>MArcello
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers