[Serusers] Contacts in 200 OK

[Jan Janak]

By phonebook do you mean the buddy list windows messenger has, for
example ? If so then there are some internet drafts on this (i.e. how to
store buddy lists on a server in an interoperable way so it could be
shared among applications), but I am afraid that there is no client
supporting this yet.

  Jan.

On 19-01 17:09, CURRO_DOMINGUEZ wrote:
> Hello, Bernie and list
> 
> I think my point of view is wrong. The behaviour of SER is absolutely 
> OK about contacts. My last explanation in previous message has been 
> terribly bad. Our problem is about phonebook.
> 
> We want to allow users to register from PC, mobile phones, smart 
> phones, iPaq,... in a multimedia environment. They should be able to 
> make voice calls and IM. But we have to find out the way to avoid users 
> write its phonebook every time they change from PC to mobil phone, for 
> example. (And all of this over IPv6, but it will be later)
> 
> So, I think the question is: Can SER manage phonebooks via 
> SUSBRIBE/NOTIFY or any other method? Should the client ask to SER for 
> phonebook table or it's a SER initiative? And if SER is not designed 
> for this, does anyone know a software, module, whatever which can 
> handle this? Or do you suggest any other way to attack this problem?
> 
> Thank you very much for your time
> 
> Curro
> 
> ----- Mensaje Original -----
> De: Bernie Hoeneisen <bhoeneis at switch.ch>
> Fecha: Lunes, Enero 19, 2004 3:35 pm
> Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Contacts in 200 OK
> 
> > Hi Curro!
> > 
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, CURRO_DOMINGUEZ wrote:
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Thanks to the list for your help. I can say that SER is running 
> > OK and
> > > we are doing a lot of very interesting tests.
> > >
> > > I have a question about contacts. As Jiri said to me, SER sends all
> > > contacts in replies to REGISTER. This reply is a 200 OK and has 
> > so many
> > > Contact fields as the user has in database.
> > 
> > This is the correct behavior as standardized in RFC 3261.
> > 
> > > The problem is that SIP clients like Windows Messenger  doesn't care
> > > about this Contact Fields. I know this isn't very important if 
> > you're> thinking of SIP Phones, but we are very interested in 
> > presence. We work
> > > with SIP applications which need to know about user's contacts from
> > > database.
> > 
> > I don't see the link between "Windows Messenger" not caring about 
> > otherContacts and a Presence feature in the database (I guess you 
> > want SER to
> > support this?).
> > 
> > > So, I would like to know if someone has tested a SIP software that
> > > works on this issue. We have looked at RFC 3261 about this, but 
> > there> isn't any comment.
> > 
> > What do you mean by "this issue"? Could you explain this a bit more.
> > 
> > 
> > T: Bernie
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers